JAMA. 2009;302(15):1681-1684.
Context Sperm donation is an increasingly common practice for achieving pregnancy in the absence of a male partner or when fertility is problematic. The unintended consequence in which genetic diseases are unwittingly transmitted to offspring is an underrecognized public health issue not previously prioritized by US Food and Drug Administration guidelines.
Objective To report the clinical circumstances and implication of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) transmitted by sperm donation to recipients.
Setting Voluntary sperm donation through a US Food and Drug Administration–approved tissue bank.
Main Outcome Measure Incidence of genetically affected offspring and clinical outcomes to date.
Results An asymptomatic 23-year-old man who had no personal knowledge of underlying heart disease and who underwent standard testing that was negative for infectious diseases, repeatedly donated sperm over a 2-year period (1990-1991). The donor was later shown to be affected (in 2005) by a novel β-myosin heavy-chain mutation that caused HCM, after an offspring wasclinically diagnosed with this disease. Of the 24 children known to be offspring of the donor, including 22 who were products of fertilization via sperm donation and 2 conceived by the donor's wife, a total of 9 genetically affected offspring, 2 to 16 years of age and 6 males, have been identified with HCM (2005-2009). Three of the 9 gene-positive children have currently expressed phenotypic evidence of HCM, including one who died at age 2 years due to progressive and unrelenting heart failure with marked hypertrophy, and also 2 survivors with extreme left ventricular hypertrophy at age 15 years. The latter 2 children and the donor are judged likely to be at increased risk for sudden death.
Conclusions This case series underscores the potential risk for transmission of inherited cardiovascular diseases through voluntary sperm donation, a problem largely unappreciated by the medical community and agencies regulating tissue donation.Recommendations include improved screening guidelines for donors to exclude cardiovascular diseases (eg, HCM) such as consideration for 12-lead electrocardiograms.
“While the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspects the operation of the banks and screening procedures for donors, this process has been directed primarily toward the prevention of infectious diseases, with little attention to the potential transmission of genetic diseases.”“This case underscores the potential risk for transmission of inherited cardiovascular diseases through voluntary sperm donation, a problem largely unappreciated by the medical community and agencies regulating tissue donation.” The article goes on to say, “We are aware of only one other documented instance in which a genetic disease was transmitted to an offspring by sperm donation”.
4 comments:
Perhaps I will write to them that there "we are aware of only one other documented instance..." is misleading since it gives the impression that such occurences are very rare, when if fact they do not appear to have conducted any such studies as to the frequency of the occurence. Nor does it seem feasible for them to conduct such a study with any accuracy, having no access to the donor identities....
so yes-if you could email me the article that would be great....
Kisarita,
Thanks for bringing this up, I meant to comment about this. First of all, the authors mentioning this is VERY misleading, you're right. However, Wendy also overreacts to that comment. That comment has a citation to it and if you follow the citation at the bottom of the article in the references, you realize that they are simply citing another article that speaks of a girl who inherits fragile X syndrome from her sperm donor.
Now, taking that into the context you realize they are not simply saying they know of one other instance of a child inheriting a disease, they are simply saying that there is one other scholarly article that discusses a child of a donor inheriting a disease.
I can assure you that 99% of the diseases that donor conceived children inherit from their donors are NOT the focus of scholarly research. Mainly because they are diseases that are not that severe, or cannot be 100% proven they came from the donor. Often they are strong coincidences, like the children of the same donor that all were autistic. There's no "autism gene" that can be traced, therefore it's not 100% proven it came from the donor. These children may be a good study subject for looking into possible genes that can predispose a person to autism though.
Anyways, really good point and I wanted to point out that what Wendy pulled from the article is taken out of context of the article (in that it was referring to another article). That's not to say that the authors are not sending a message that makes the danger of inherited diseases less important than they are, I think that was surely a poor choice of words. But these are researchers and that article was not meant for us in the donor conception community, but rather other researchers.
I will send you that article as well.
Please see Dr. Kirk Maxey's response on the DSR blog to the authors of this article:
http://www.donorsiblingregistry.com/DSRblog/?p=86
It will highlight several other known instances of donor conceived children inheriting genetic diseases (several of them are actually scholarly articles). I will see if I can track down the citations for those articles for the future.
Post a Comment